Image by Renegade98 via Flickr
Tapped makes a great point about Rep. Hoekstra WSJ op-ed:
Hoekstra also eliminates the context of Blair's remarks in order to misrepresent them -- Blair concluded
that "the bottom line is these techniques have hurt our image around
the world, the damage they have done to our interests far outweighed
whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our
national security," which is a substantially different takeaway from
the idea that torture was more valuable than the CIA, the FBI, and the
NSA put together.
Hoekstra argues that "it was not necessary to release details of the
enhanced interrogation techniques, because members of Congress from
both parties have been fully aware of them since the program began in
2002." He adds that "it appeared that Mr. Obama understood it would be
unfair to prosecute U.S. government employees for carrying out a policy
that had been fully vetted and approved by the executive branch and
Congress." So Hoekstra believes the government is entitled to break the
law in secret as long as it does so by committee.
Hoekstra never acknowledges that the "enhanced interrogations"
constituted torture, because then he'd have to argue that government
officials are above the law. But that's essentially what he's arguing
anyway.